Chao-Footnotes
to Kristevan Semiotics
(absract)
Fred Abraham

The following philosophical
and methodological backgrounds are assumed for my discussion:
1. Philosophical
Hermeneutics: The interpretation of the ontology of being, ". . . the primacy
of Being, with our dependency on 'the given,' on human nature, language,
culture, tradition, and social practices." Rhetoric and hermeneutics are
complementary. (Crusius, 1991)
2. A Chao-theoretical
approach to creativity (Abraham, 1995)
3. A rapprochement
of feminist theory/psychology and postmodern discourse (Heilbrun,1996).
Similar in deconstructing power bases, but the postmodern approach is complicitous
without an agenda, while the feminist approach seeks power with a replacement
agenda.
Kristeva, some of her fundamental
positions with my chao-footnotes:
She has a "theory of marginality,
subversion and dissidence. She believes in the potentially revolutionary
force of the marginal and repressed aspects of language. She identifies
the semiotic with a repressed feminine libidinal system,
and the symbolic with a masculine libidinal system. R. Eisler,
& R. Abraham extend this dichotomy to higher dimensional chaos and
lower-order lococentricity respectively (chao-footnote 1). The semiotic
is anarchic, pre-Oedipal, and polymorphous erotgenically, maternally oreinted,
and involves primary processes. The symbolic is Oedipalized,
paternally oreinted, and involves secondary processes. It is "order superimposed
on the semiotic. The semiotic overflows its boundaries . . . in madness,
holiness and poetry.", and avant-guarde art and texts.
Kristeva is Lacanian, whose
mirror-image metaphor is also chaoetic when he emphasized not only that
we are not possessed of fixed characteristics, but that we never get a
stable image of self, from either internal, or external (the mirror) sources.
Kristeva's fluid semiotic feminine overflow can thus be seen to have its
roots in the Lacanian mirror. Chaos theory can provide models for the inclusion
of both stability, instability, and change; chao-footnote 2).
The synthesis of these ideas
with those of chaos theory lies in the use of both chaos and bifurcation
(self-organized or autopoetic major transformations) emerging from the
Lacanian/Kristevan synthesis, and leads to discourse nurturing the emergence
of change, internal emancipation and external, social empowerment, from
the feminist/chao-theoretical synthesis (Murphy & Abraham). (Chao-footnote
3.)
Quotes and précis material
on Kristeva and Lacan are from M. Sarup (1993), An Introductory Guide
to Post-structuralism and Postmodernism, 2nd ed.
Created for WESS May 10-11,
1998, Washington DC 3/7/98 Updated 4/19/98 & 6/26/98 & 9/17/00